Non-Solicitation Agreement

May 27th, 2026   |    By: Ryan RutanCMO    |    Tags: Legal Structure, Non-Compete Agreement, Restrictive Covenants, Employment Agreement

Non-Solicitation Agreement

A non-solicitation agreement is a contractual provision restricting former employees from soliciting the former employer's customers or employees for a defined period. The covenant typically runs 12-24 months post-termination, covering customer non-solicitation (no outreach to former-employer customers) and employee non-solicitation (no recruiting current employees). Sometimes standalone, often part of an employment agreement or restrictive covenants, it serves as a more-enforceable alternative to non-competes because it doesn't prevent the former employee from working at a competitor but does protect the employer's customer relationships and team stability. It is generally more enforceable than non-competes across jurisdictions and a common element of restrictive covenant frameworks.

The two types:

Customer non-solicitation:

  • Former employee can't reach out to former employer's customers to solicit business.
  • Often includes prospects in the pipeline at time of departure.
  • Duration: typically 12-24 months.
  • Protects customer relationships and revenue.

Employee non-solicitation:

  • Former employee can't recruit current employees of former employer.
  • Sometimes covers passive recruitment (recruiter outreach) and active poaching.
  • Duration: typically 12-24 months.
  • Protects team stability and prevents mass employee defections to competitors.

Why more enforceable than non-competes:

Doesn't prevent employment: former employee can work anywhere; just can't solicit specific protected parties.

Narrower scope: targets specific behaviors rather than entire employment.

Easier to define: specific lists of protected customers and employees are concrete.

Courts more willing to enforce: balance between employer protection and employee mobility.

Even in California: customer non-solicitation has limited enforceability (Business and Professions Code 16600), but employee non-solicitation can be enforced in some narrow circumstances.

Common scope provisions:

Defined customer list: specific named customers (sometimes attached as exhibit).

Definition of "customer": current customers, customers in last X months, prospects.

Acts considered solicitation: outreach to encourage customer to switch; provision of competitive services; sometimes accepting business even if not actively solicited.

Carve-outs: customers who reach out without solicitation; pre-existing relationships; general public marketing.

Common scope failures:

Too broad: "all customers ever" gets unenforceable.

Vague definitions: unclear what counts as solicitation.

No carve-outs: customers who proactively reach out shouldn't be off-limits.

Ryan's Take

Non-competes are getting harder to enforce. Non-solicits are the protection you can actually count on, and usually the one you really need. Put both customer and employee non-solicitation in your employment agreements, with a specific customer list and a clear definition of what counts as soliciting. Leave reasonable carve-outs for inbound customer interest. You get real protection without trying to block where people can work.

What founders get wrong: Relying on non-competes for protection when non-solicitation is both more enforceable and often sufficient. The right discipline: non-solicitation as primary protection; non-compete only where enforceable.

Related: [Non-Compete Agreement] · [Restrictive Covenants] · [Employment Agreement] · [NDA]

FAQ

What is a non-solicitation agreement? A contractual provision restricting former employees from soliciting the former employer's customers (customer non-solicitation) or employees (employee non-solicitation) for a defined period (typically 12-24 months post-termination). More enforceable than non-competes.

How is non-solicitation different from non-compete? Non-solicitation: can't solicit specific protected parties (customers, employees); can still work anywhere. Non-compete: can't work for competitors at all. Non-solicit is narrower, more enforceable, less aggressive on employee mobility.

Are non-solicitation agreements enforceable in California? Customer non-solicitation has limited enforceability in California (Business and Professions Code Section 16600). Employee non-solicitation can be enforced in some narrow circumstances. Generally more enforceable than non-competes (which are largely unenforceable) but with constraints. Always seek California-specific counsel.


About the Author

Ryan Rutan

Founding Partner @ Startups.com platform | Clarity.fm, Launchrock, Fundable, Zirtual, and Co-Host of The Startup Therapy Podcast. Ryan has 15 years of experience as a Founder, Advisor, Mentor, and Investor — the quintessential startup guerrilla. He works with 100's of the best startups every year on everything from ideation, idea validation, early marketing traction, customer acquisition to fundraising, scaling, and operations.

Discuss this Article

Comments
 
Unlock Startups Unlimited

Access 20,000+ Startup Experts, 650+ masterclass videos, 1,000+ in-depth guides, and all the software tools you need to launch and grow quickly.

Already a member? Sign in

Copyright © 2026 Startups.com LLC. All rights reserved.